<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
  <title>Cyrus Montakab Blog - translation tag</title>
  <link>http://www.softwaremining.com/blog/CyrusMontakab/tags/translation/</link>
  <description>SoftwareMining  - Legacy Modernization Blogs</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <copyright>Cyrus Montakab</copyright>
  <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:06:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <generator>Pebble (http://pebble.sourceforge.net)</generator>
  <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
  
  
  
  
  <item>
    <title>Semantic translation - First requirement for generation of &#034;Maintainable&#034; Code</title>
    <link>http://www.softwaremining.com/blog/CyrusMontakab/2009/04/17/1239971040000.html</link>
    
      
      
        <description>
          &lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href=&#034;http://www.softwaremining.com/blog/CyrusMontakab/2009/04/16.html&#034;&gt;my yesterday&#039;s blog&lt;/a&gt;, I asked what would be the desirable characteristics for a COBOL program re-written in Java or C#? It doesn&#039;t really matter whether the process is achieved in a manual rewrite, or through automatic translation. But the amount&amp;nbsp;of time and budget allocated to the system matters a lot. If there was a BIG budget and a lot of time, you could end-up with an &amp;quot;ideal&amp;quot; solution (or run over-time and budget, and have the project cancelled).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, without further ado, here is the major characteristic: &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#034;http://www.softwaremining.com/blog/CyrusMontakab/2009/04/17/1239971040000.html&#034;&gt;Read more...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
        </description>
      
    
    
    
    <category>Legacy Modernization</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.softwaremining.com/blog/CyrusMontakab/2009/04/17/1239971040000.html#comments</comments>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.softwaremining.com/blog/CyrusMontakab/2009/04/17/1239971040000.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <title>Resistence is Futile ... You will be Translated</title>
    <link>http://www.softwaremining.com/blog/CyrusMontakab/2009/04/16/1239885120000.html</link>
    
      
      
        <description>
          &lt;p&gt;Various reports suggest that the COBOL code base is still growing between 3 to  5% per year. The past Legacy modernization projects have only touched the tip of  the iceburg. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The modernization projects to-date has mostly started due to an immediate  &amp;quot;necessity&amp;quot; such as business process changes. In this situation, where budgets  allowed, it made sense to re-document, extract the rules, re-design and rewrite.  My company - SoftwareMining we also produce business rule extraction tools for  this market. But in this discussion, I want to focus on Translations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As I said, I think we have just seen tip of the iceberg ... &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#034;http://www.softwaremining.com/blog/CyrusMontakab/2009/04/16/1239885120000.html&#034;&gt;Read more...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
        </description>
      
    
    
    
    <category>Legacy Modernization</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.softwaremining.com/blog/CyrusMontakab/2009/04/16/1239885120000.html#comments</comments>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.softwaremining.com/blog/CyrusMontakab/2009/04/16/1239885120000.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  
  </channel>
</rss>
