<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">

  <channel rdf:about="http://www.softwaremining.com/blog/">
    <title>Cyrus Montakab</title>
    <link>http://www.softwaremining.com/blog/</link>
    <description></description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        
        <rdf:li resource="http://www.softwaremining.com/blog/CyrusMontakab/2009/06/22/1245661560000.html" />
        
        <rdf:li resource="http://www.softwaremining.com/blog/CyrusMontakab/2009/06/15/1245093960000.html" />
        
        <rdf:li resource="http://www.softwaremining.com/blog/CyrusMontakab/2009/06/14/1244979900000.html" />
        
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel>

  
  <item rdf:about="http://www.softwaremining.com/blog/CyrusMontakab/2009/06/22/1245661560000.html">
    <title>COBOL programmer salaries up by 43% in 1 year</title>
    <link>http://www.softwaremining.com/blog/CyrusMontakab/2009/06/22/1245661560000.html</link>
    
      
      
        <description>
          See &lt;a href=&#034;javascript:void(0);/*1245004125832*/&#034;&gt;IT Job Watch &lt;/a&gt;site.&amp;nbsp; Here is my ideas on the reasons for this increase ...&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#034;http://www.softwaremining.com/blog/CyrusMontakab/2009/06/22/1245661560000.html&#034;&gt;Read more...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
        </description>
      
    
  </item>
  
  <item rdf:about="http://www.softwaremining.com/blog/CyrusMontakab/2009/06/15/1245093960000.html">
    <title>Microfocus&#039;s increasing license costs &amp; Legacy Modernization</title>
    <link>http://www.softwaremining.com/blog/CyrusMontakab/2009/06/15/1245093960000.html</link>
    
      
      
        <description>
          Legacy Modernization focus is changing faster from Rehosting to translation - thanks to the ever increasing Microfocus license costs.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#034;http://www.softwaremining.com/blog/CyrusMontakab/2009/06/15/1245093960000.html&#034;&gt;Read more...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
        </description>
      
    
  </item>
  
  <item rdf:about="http://www.softwaremining.com/blog/CyrusMontakab/2009/06/14/1244979900000.html">
    <title>From COBOL Data-Types to Java/C# Primitive data-types</title>
    <link>http://www.softwaremining.com/blog/CyrusMontakab/2009/06/14/1244979900000.html</link>
    
      
      
        <description>
          &lt;p&gt;This is a continuation of my &lt;a href=&#034;http://www.softwaremining.com/blog/CyrusMontakab/2009/04/16.html&#034;&gt;&lt;font color=&#034;#0066cc&#034;&gt;earlier blog&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - asking what would be the desirable characteristics of a COBOL program - rewritten in OO Java or C#. I followed that post with a description of first steps &lt;a href=&#034;http://www.softwaremining.com/blog/CyrusMontakab/2009/04/22/1240400400000.html&#034;&gt;to go from Structured data definitions into an Object-Oriented design&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In this posting, we&#039;ll look at what can happen to all the data-items, COBOL redefinitions, COMP variables and etc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#034;http://www.softwaremining.com/blog/CyrusMontakab/2009/06/14/1244979900000.html&#034;&gt;Read more...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
        </description>
      
    
  </item>
  

</rdf:RDF>
